Librarians and the CIA
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1da2c/1da2ca2b528254fb19167a07ff765cec17683ace" alt=""
"This was a totally fascinating set of sessions. The CIA folks there included visionaries (e.g., Calvin Andrus), internal bloggers, the people behind Intellipedia (an in-house wikipedia), folks from the daily in-house newspaper, and some managers not yet sold on the idea of blogs and wikis and tags. ... The people we met with are serious about understanding the opportunities, experimenting, piloting, and evangelizing."
First thought: The CIA has an in-house Wikipedia!?
Second thought: When CIA analysts—a process-oriented, authority- and expertise-driven profession if ever there was one—get serious about social software, isn't it time for mainstream librarians to get interested?
And the water-boarding? Okay, maybe librarians should avoid following everything the CIA does.
*My invitation lost in the mail, I'm sure.
5 Comments:
Who told you that mainstream librarians are not interested? After all, the largest group on your site is Librarians who LibraryThing (at 815 members).
I wonder what the Intellipedia says about the world elephant population. :-)
Wow. I don't actually get that one! I feel a cultural reference passing me by...
See http://thebiblioholic.livejournal.com/200390.html
I work in a Big-10 library, and I prefer the quiet of my office, the stacks, lots of coffee and the scholarly environment. Torture, secrecy, toppling governments, aiding druglords, etc. just doesn't quite have the same charm.
Post a Comment
<< Home